Some Gardening Philosophies:


-------------------------------------------------

Natural gardening:

Fukuoka, M. The Natural Way of Farming: The Theory and Practice of Green Philosophy. Tokyo and New York: Japan Publications, 1985: "Highly unusual viewpoints with a cult following". Downloads as a PDF of 6.16 mb. OUT OF PRINT. <http://www.soilandhealth.org/copyform.aspx?bookcode=010164>


Masanobu Fukuoka
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masanobu_Fukuoka>

Masanobu Fukuoka (福 岡 正信 Fukuoka Masanobu?, 2 February 1913 – 16 August 2008) was a Japanese farmer and philosopher celebrated for his natural farming and re-vegetation of desertified lands. He was a proponent of no-till, no-herbicide grain cultivation farming methods traditional to many indigenous cultures,[1] from which he created a particular method of farming, commonly referred to as "Natural Farming" or "Do-nothing Farming".[2][3][4]

Fukuoka was the author of several Japanese books, scientific papers and other publications, and was featured in television documentaries and interviews from the 1970s onwards.[5]

His influences went beyond farming to inspire individuals within the natural food and lifestyle movements. He was an outspoken advocate of the value of observing nature's principles.[6]



Seed ball
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seed_ball>

Seed balls, also known as "earth balls", nendo dango (Japanese: 粘土 団子?), boule de graines in French and so on, consist of a variety of different seeds rolled within a ball of clay, preferably volcanic plastic red clay. Into this medium various additives may be included, such as humus or compost. These are placed around the seeds, at the center of the ball, to provide microbial inoculants. Cotton-fibres or liquified paper are sometimes mixed into the clay in order to strengthen it, or liquified paper mash coated on the outside to further protect the clay ball during sowing by throwing, or in particularly harsh habitats.

The technique for creating seed balls was rediscovered by Japanese natural farming pioneer Masanobu Fukuoka.[1] The technique had been used in ancient times in the Middle East, Egypt and parts of North Africa. The technique was also used, for instance, in ancient Egypt to repair farms after the annual spring flooding of the Nile.[citation needed] In modern times, during the period of the Second World War, this Japanese government plant scientist working in a government lab, Fukuoka, who lived on the mountainous island of Shikoku, wanted to find a technique that would increase food production without taking away from the land already allocated for traditional rice production.[2][3] He read extensively and came across mention of the ancient technique[citation needed] which thrived in the volcanic rich soils of Japan.

To make a seed ball, generally about 5 measures of red clay by volume are combined with one measure of seeds. The balls are formed between 10mm and 80mm (about 0.4 to 3.15 inches) in diameter.[4] The patent has been deemed unenforceable throughout the world because of the ancient practice.

Seed balls have use in nearly any region where plants can grow: for reseeding ecosystems into areas of man-made deserts, avoiding seed eating insects and animals and protecting seeds until rains fall to soak the clay ball and stimulate the seeds. Seeds contained in such balls then germinate in ideal conditions for each climate/region.


Guerrilla gardening
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guerilla_gardening>

Guerrilla gardening is gardening on land that the gardeners do not have legal right to use, often an abandoned site or area not cared for by anyone. It encompasses a very diverse range of people and motivations, from the enthusiastic gardener who spills over their legal boundaries to the highly political gardener who seeks to provoke change through direct action.

The land that is guerrilla gardened is usually abandoned or neglected by its legal owner. That land is used by guerrilla gardeners to raise plants, frequently focusing on food crops or plants intended to beautify an area. This practice has implications for land rights and land reform; it promotes re-consideration of land ownership in order to reclaim land from perceived neglect or misuse and assign a new purpose to it.

Some guerrilla gardeners carry out their actions at night, in relative secrecy, to sow and tend a new vegetable patch or flower garden in an effort to make the area of use and/or more attractive. Some garden at more visible hours to be seen by their community. It has grown into a form of proactive activism or pro-activism.

Toxicity risks

There are some health risks to foraging or planting edible plants near toxic waste sites and roads with heavy traffic due to chemical runoff that gets absorbed by the roots. Toxic plants tend to grow on toxic land. Some scientists[who?] have learned that certain types of plants absorb toxins from the soil without dying and can thus be used as a mechanism to reduce chemical ground pollution. Guerrilla gardening could be used as a way to take independent action to clean up one's community, but eating a toxin-absorbent plant will deposit those toxins in the body.

Urban foragers face similar health risks in this manner. Care should be taken to not eat plants that grow in areas where there is known chemical contamination or water pollution. Plants that grow on the side of high-traffic roads should also not be eaten because of automobile fluid runoff.

-------------------------------------------------

Permaculture:

Tropical Permaculture <www.tropicalpermaculture.com>
(excellent site -with lots of information about tropical gardening)

Permaculture is a useful system for low input gardening, using mainly
perennial plants: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permaculture>

Essence of Permaculture
<http://www.holmgren.com.au/DLFiles/PDFs/Essence_of_PC_eBook.pdf>

-------------------------------------------------

Forest farming:

Forest farming is a less artificial and more traditional way of
achieving a similar result to Permaculture:  <http://www.agroecology.org/Case%20Studies/homegardens.html>


Under the direction of Dr. Stephen R. Gliessman, the Agroecology Research Group at UCSC applies agroecological concepts and principles to the design and management of sustainable food systems. This interdisciplinary group is comprised of faculty, graduate and undergraduate students, research associates, postdoctoral researchers, and occasional international visitors from the broader agroecological community. Participatory action research (PAR) and action education approaches are used to build relationships in the food system that foster change and the transition to sustainability. The undergraduate residential action-education Program in Community and Agroecology (PICA) and the non-profit organization Community Agroecology Network (CAN) are both involved in the work of the Agroecology Research Group. The Research Group has offices at a growing demonstration site for Sustainable Living technologies and activities at the University of California, Santa Cruz. The site is also the location for the group's annual International Agroecology Shortcourse, seminars and workshops in agroecology, and community related events. <http://www.agroecology.org/People.html>


Principles of agroecology and sustainability: <http://www.agroecology.org/Principles_List.html>


The goal of agroecology is to develop and manage sustainable agroecosystems.

  We are now in the process of preparing a broad, web-based, definition of agroecology and sustainability for use by researchers, educators, development workers, decision-makers, consumers, and farmers.  We focus on the following questions:
What is agroecology?
What are agroecosystems?
What is sustainability?
What are the agroecological principles that guide development of sustainable agroecosystems?
How do we measure sustainability in agroecosystems?
What are the best agroecological indicators of sustainability?
<http://www.agroecology.org/Principles.html>

-------------------------------------------------

Quesungual – remember the name, and not just for Scrabble

<http://www.ciatnews.cgiar.org/2012/12/10/quesungual-remember-the-name-and-not-just-for-scrabble/>
Home / Climate Change / Quesungual – remember the name, and not just for Scrabble
10 December, 2012 by Neil Palmer (comments)

When Hurricane Mitch struck Honduras in 1998, torrential downpours triggered landslides that wiped out huge areas of crops. This compounded a shockwave of malnutrition spreading across the country caused by an intense El Niño-driven drought the year before. But some farmers suffered only minor losses or none at all: they were practicing Quesungual (“Ke-sun-gwal”).
NP Honduras 1-22If Quesungual sounds like some kind of agricultural martial art, that’s because in some ways it is: it’s a robust, time-honoured self-defence system that has enabled smallholder Davids to withstand attacks from climatic Goliaths. It’s perfectly suited to many parts of Central America, which – at the best of times – suffers from a kind of climatic bipolar disorder, swinging between periods of extreme drought and intense rain.
Easily-established but biologically complex, Quesungual offers a sustainable and resilient alternative to the widespread practice of slash-and-burn. As well as helping safeguard long-term soil fertility and food production, the system can help smallholders adapt to the kinds of extreme weather expected to become more frequent as a result of climate change.

Slash & Mulch
 
It was in the early 1990s that the UN Food and agriculture Organisation (FAO), together with farmers and local organisations in the Lempira department of Honduras began promoting Quesungual, an agroforestry system for hillsides that combines traditional knowledge with new insights into sustainable land management. The double-whammy of El Niño and Mitch was a formidable trial-by-fire, and provided the proof of resilience of the system that many farmers needed in order to adopt it.

In a well-managed Quesungual system different kinds of trees are scattered at a density of up to 1,000 per hectare of cropland. The tree roots act as deep anchors, stabilising hillsides, minimising soil erosion by wind and rain, and improving nutrient recycling from deeper soil layers. Most of the trees are heavily pruned at regular intervals, the green cuttings laid around the base of the crops both as nutritious mulch; chemical fertilisers are used in place of the nutrients that slash-and-burn farmers would normally obtain from the ash.

The mulch helps retain soil moisture giving crops some protection against failed rains, and can help reduce the leaching of nutrients. It also encourages earthworms that break down the organic matter, move nutrients around, aerate the soil, and improve soil structure. Farmers don’t plough or till the land, instead planting trees and crops straight into the ground, again to preserve soil structure and stability.

Some of the trees are kept so small it’s hard to spot them for the maize or sorghum that tower above – just waist-high stumps, sprouting with new shoots; next season’s mulch. Others are left to grow big enough to provide timber and fruits. As well as capturing carbon dioxide, many of the trees promoted in the system fix nitrogen, helping to improve soil fertility; others draw essential crop nutrients such as phosphorous and potassium from deep in the soil. The overall result is a more productive, more reliable farming system – come rain or shine.

While there are some tradeoffs as the larger trees compete with crops for nutrients and light, crop productivity is maintained for many years, compared to slash-and-burn where plots have to be abandoned every one-to-three years. Soil scientist Steven Fonte, of the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), has worked extensively in Lempira to validate the science behind the system.

“Very soon after establishing Quesungual, you see significant improvements in soil quality and stability compared to traditional methods like slash-and-burn,” he said. “In these tropical areas, trees grow and soil conditions change rapidly, so farmers quickly see the benefits. The result is a resilient food production system ideally suited to hillsides.
“Not long ago, if you looked out across these hills you’d have seen a continuous haze of smoke, as farmers burned their land in preparation for planting. Now the air remains pure and the hillsides green – almost everyone is practicing Quesungual; they’re convinced it works.”

CIAT research suggests that the principles of Quesungual can be applied in other tropical, sub-humid parts of Latin America and the Caribbean, sub-Saharan Africa and Asia.


Beauty vs Beauty

Interestingly, with trees of different types and heights scattered around a hillside of maize, for example, a Quesungual system can, at first glance, seem somewhat disorderly. But that’s really just a mind-trick. While it’s tempting to equate an efficient, productive agricultural system with one that exhibits symmetry, or orderly patterns of crops that are pleasing to the eye, systems like these are sometimes indicative of long-term environmental decline.

Instead, Quesungual mimics the diversity of natural landscapes, while combining the benefits of sustainable land management. Its beauty is therefore systemic rather than aesthetic, and that’s where the real attraction of the system lies.

-------------------------------------------------

Project Home Farm


 
Trevor Batten
 <trevor at tebatt dot net>
 Baclayon 2013
 home